Processing has one job: to get from a wet, sugary fruit to a stable, dry seed without rot or mould. The methods differ in when the fruit is removed.
In the washed process, the skin and pulp are stripped off mechanically soon after picking. The sticky mucilage that remains is broken down by fermentation in tanks, usually for a day or two, and then washed away, or removed mechanically. The seed is dried in its parchment. Because the fruit is gone early, the result is generally described as clean and clear, with the coffee's acidity prominent.
In the natural or dry process, the whole cherry is dried intact, like a raisin, and the dried fruit is hulled off afterwards. It is the oldest method and needs little water. The seed spends weeks in contact with fermenting fruit, and naturals are generally described as fruitier, sweeter and heavier, sometimes winey.
Between them sits the honey or pulped natural process: the skin is removed but some or all of the mucilage is left on during drying. The names 'white', 'yellow', 'red' and 'black' honey loosely indicate how much mucilage was left and how slowly it dried. The cups tend to fall between washed and natural.
Three routes from cherry to dry seed
CoffeeHQ diagram
Washed
1PulpSkin and flesh stripped off.
2FermentMucilage broken down in tanks.
3WashMucilage rinsed away.
4Dry in parchment
5Hull
Honey or pulped natural
1PulpSkin stripped off.
2Leave the mucilage onSome or all of it.
3Dry in parchmentSticky, and turned often.
4Hull
Natural
1Sort whole cherries
2Dry the whole fruitFor weeks, turned regularly.
3HullDried fruit and parchment removed together.
The principal steps of each process. Practice varies by country and producer, and many producers blur the lines on purpose.
Wet hulling, known in Indonesia as giling basah, is a regional method that produces a recognisable style. The coffee is pulped and briefly fermented as in the washed process, but then the parchment is hulled off while the seed is still very moist, and the bare seed finishes drying unprotected. The method suits a humid climate where drying in parchment is slow.
The result is the low-acid, heavy, earthy or herbal profile widely associated with Sumatra. It is a clear case of a flavour attributed to a place that belongs largely to a process.
Fermentation happens in every process, whether intended or not. Yeasts and bacteria that live on the fruit and in the environment consume the sugars in the mucilage. In the washed process this is used to loosen the mucilage. In naturals it happens inside the drying cherry. The microbes also produce acids, alcohols and other compounds, some of which pass into the seed and shape flavour.
Controlled, it adds complexity. Uncontrolled, it produces defects: vinegar-like sourness, a rotting or 'ferment' taste, or a medicinal note. The variables are the familiar ones of any fermentation — time, temperature, how much oxygen is present and which organisms dominate.
The methods sold as experimental are attempts to steer those variables. 'Anaerobic' means fermenting in a sealed vessel with oxygen excluded. 'Carbonic maceration', a term borrowed from winemaking, means fermenting whole cherries in a vessel flushed with carbon dioxide. Some producers add selected yeasts, and some ferment with added fruit or other material, which is usually called co-fermentation and is controversial, because it blurs the line between a coffee's own flavour and an added one. These terms are not regulated and are used loosely; how the result tastes varies enormously from producer to producer.
Whatever came before, the coffee must be dried to a moisture content of roughly ten to twelve per cent to be stable for storage and export. Too wet and it moulds; dried too fast or too hot and the seed is damaged and ages badly; dried unevenly and the lot is inconsistent.
Coffee is dried on patios, on raised mesh beds that let air circulate underneath, or in mechanical dryers, and is turned regularly. Slow, even drying is widely regarded as better for both flavour and how long the green coffee keeps. It is unglamorous work, and it is where many otherwise good coffees are lost.
Your task. Use the compare-two-coffees mode with a washed and a natural coffee. Score body, acidity, sweetness and clarity for each before reading either bag's tasting notes, then save or copy the comparison.
What to notice. Your own notes are labelled as yours. If they match the textbook description of washed and natural, you have tasted a tendency; if they do not, you have learned that the tendency has exceptions.
Exercise: Washed beside natural
Objective. Taste what processing can do, with as much else held constant as retail coffee allows.
You will need
A washed and a natural coffee, ideally from the same country and roaster, at a similar roast
Two bowls or cups
Keep the same
Same recipe, same water
Tasted blind if possible
Procedure
Smell the dry grounds of each.
Brew both and taste side by side.
Describe fruit character, body and how clean the finish is.
Decide which you would call 'cleaner' and which 'fruitier', then check the bags.
What to notice
Is one noticeably fruitier or more wine-like?
Is one heavier?
Which finish is shorter and clearer?
Reading what you found
Naturals are often described as fruitier and heavier and washed coffees as cleaner and brighter, because the fruit stays on the seed during drying in one and is removed first in the other. Many pairs will fit that description and some will not: a carefully dried natural can be very clean, and a washed coffee with a long fermentation can be very fruity.
What this cannot show
Two coffees from the same country are still different lots, often different varieties and farms.
This shows what processing can do, not what it always does.
A protocol for you to run. CoffeeHQ has not run it and reports no result from it.
A customer returns a bag labelled 'anaerobic natural', saying it smells of overripe fruit and rum and tastes almost alcoholic. They ask whether it has gone bad.
Reasoning it out
The label describes a long, oxygen-free fermentation of whole fruit, which is designed to produce intense fermented-fruit character.
Boozy, tropical and winey notes are the intended result of that method, not spoilage after roasting.
Whether that intensity is pleasant is a matter of preference, and of how well the fermentation was controlled.
A true defect would be more like vinegar, rot or a medicinal taste.
What to do
The coffee is very likely as the producer intended. The honest answer is that this style divides people, and that 'washed' is the word to look for if they want the opposite. If it tastes of vinegar rather than fruit, that is over-fermentation and a fair complaint.
World Coffee Research variety and agronomy resources — World Coffee Research (WCR)
The World Atlas of Coffee, James Hoffmann
SCA green coffee grading protocol and defect classification — Specialty Coffee Association
Sections are labelled with the kind of claim they make. How CoffeeHQ uses sources, and what each one is relied on for, is set out in the source and evidence policy.
Kept in this browser only, so you can see where you left off. It is not sent to CoffeeHQ or anyone else, and clearing your site data removes it.