Skip to content
CoffeeHQ

World coffee atlas

Coffee is grown commercially in around fifty countries, almost all of them between the tropics. Where it comes from changes what is in the cup — but not in the way a label usually implies.

No country has a flavour. What differs from one origin to the next is the species and varieties planted, the altitude and climate they grow in, how the fruit is processed after picking, and how the coffee is graded and sold. Those are the things each atlas entry explains, so that a name on a bag tells you something you can use.

The ten largest coffee producers

Measured data

Coffee production of the ten largest producing countries, Marketing year 2025/26
CountryProduction
Brazil63 million bags
Vietnam31.7 million bags
Colombia12.5 million bags
Indonesia12.4 million bags
Ethiopia11.6 million bags
Uganda7.09 million bags
India6.43 million bags
Honduras5.53 million bags
Peru4.76 million bags
Mexico4.08 million bags

Two countries grow more than half the world's coffee, and they grow different things: Brazil is mostly arabica, Vietnam almost entirely robusta. Volume is the only thing this chart measures: Kenya, which sells almost all its coffee through one auction founded in 1935 and bred varieties of its own, does not appear here at all.

Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Coffee: World Markets and Trade, July 2026 circular. Period: Marketing year 2025/26. Estimate, as published in July 2026. One bag is 60 kg of green coffee; world production was estimated at 178.8 million bags. Marketing years differ between countries. Linked countries have an atlas entry.

By part of the world

Countries with a card have a full atlas entry. The others are producers CoffeeHQ has evidence for and no entry yet. Each of those gives the figure a dataset holds for it and links to a short account from named sources, which says what it does not know. Those accounts are kept together on the atlas's coverage page.

East Africa

Producers without an entry yet

Middle East

South America

Producers without an entry yet

Central America and Mexico

Caribbean

Producers without an entry yet

South Asia

Southeast Asia

Producers without an entry yet

East Asia

Oceania

West and Central Africa

Producers without an entry yet

Southern Africa

Producers without an entry yet

North America

By size of crop

Producers sorted by what is known of their volume. The first two bands divide one published estimate, the USDA's for marketing year 2025/26, at one million bags; the others record only what kind of evidence there is. The order says nothing else: a small crop is not a lesser coffee, and several of the smallest producers here matter for a plant, a disease or a history out of proportion to their size.

Major producer (one million bags or more, USDA 2025/26)

Brazil (63 million bags); Vietnam (31.7 million bags); Colombia (12.5 million bags); Indonesia (12.4 million bags); Ethiopia (11.6 million bags); Uganda (7.09 million bags); India (6.43 million bags); Honduras (5.53 million bags); Peru (4.76 million bags); Mexico (4.08 million bags); Guatemala (3.15 million bags); Nicaragua (2.56 million bags); China (1.9 million bags); Malaysia (1.5 million bags); Tanzania (1.45 million bags); Côte d'Ivoire (1.3 million bags); Costa Rica (1.16 million bags).

Small producer (itemised below one million bags)

Thailand (900,000 bags); Kenya (850,000 bags); Papua New Guinea (800,000 bags); El Salvador (586,000 bags); Venezuela (500,000 bags); Laos (475,000 bags); Philippines (450,000 bags); Ecuador (350,000 bags).

Minor producer, not quantified (named by the USDA, no figure)

Angola; Bolivia; Burundi; Cameroon; Cuba; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Dominican Republic; Guinea; Jamaica; Madagascar; Malawi; Panama; Rwanda; Sierra Leone; Togo; United States.

Small producer with an official figure reported to the FAO (not named by the USDA)

Cape Verde; Guyana; Nepal; Sri Lanka; Zimbabwe.

Insufficient evidence of volume (ICO membership only)

Central African Republic; Gabon; Ghana; Liberia; Mozambique; Nigeria; Timor-Leste; Yemen; Zambia.

By species

The atlas follows four species. A country that grows two of them is two origins in one, and the second is easy to miss. A country is listed where its entry or its note documents the species; a country missing from a list is one whose sources do not mention it.

Arabica

Atlas entries: Brazil, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Nicaragua, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Uganda, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen.

  • Angola: Arabica made up 2 per cent of production in the early 1970s, grown north of Huambo and in the Cuima highlands, on the same report.
  • Bolivia: The thesis says only arabica coffees are planted in Bolivia. A 2026 paper sampling coffee fields in Caranavi describes them as Coffea arabica.
  • Burundi: Ninety-eight per cent of output on a World Bank assessment of 2011, which describes it as mainly of the Bourbon variety.
  • Cape Verde: The 2022 inventory lists Coffea arabica among the islands' introduced useful plants and in an inventory of the 1780s. Where it describes the crop grown today it writes only 'Coffea spp.'.
  • Cuba: The lender's report sets a separate yield baseline for arabica, and Cuban officials describe arabica as the coffee the country exports.
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo: A donor's guide of 2022 places arabica in the east, in North Kivu, South Kivu and the eastern part of Ituri. It gives no area, and no document read names a variety planted.
  • Laos: A quarter of production and rising, on a study published in 2015. A 2022 article's statement that four fifths of plantations are arabica agrees with nothing else read.
  • Liberia: Named by the seed project among the three species it collected from farmers' fields. No document read says where in Liberia it is grown.
  • Madagascar: Grown in the highlands, where the same report says district figures for 2005 to 2010 show production to be very marginal. No document read names an arabica variety grown in Madagascar.
  • Malawi: The working paper describes arabica grown by smallholders on the hillsides of northern Malawi and on estates in the south; the FAO paper lists Malawi as an arabica producer.
  • Malaysia: Three per cent on the same figures; a 2016 article by two government researchers listed none grown commercially.
  • Mozambique: Arabica is cultivated on Gorongosa Mountain in Sofala province and was sampled in Niassa; the paper gives no area or volume for either.
  • Nigeria: The crop of the national institute's Mambilla station. The institute's pages give no area or production for it.
  • Zambia: The United Nations project's trials and recommended selections were all arabica, and the FAO paper lists Zambia as an arabica producer.
  • Zimbabwe: The 2013 paper says only arabica is produced in Zimbabwe; the FAO paper of 2000 lists the country as an arabica producer.

Robusta

Atlas entries: Brazil, Cameroon, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Vietnam.

  • Angola: Robusta was the main cash crop before independence, first planted under thinned natural forest where wild coffee already grew, on the 1977 report's account.
  • Burundi: Two per cent of output on the same assessment, which places it in the Imbo plain, the low ground along the Rusizi river and Lake Tanganyika.
  • Central African Republic: The country's crop, on the government's account: robusta introduced in 1921. Wild canephora, including the Nana population, also grows in its forests.
  • Côte d'Ivoire: Every bag is robusta in the USDA's tables. A 2025 review of robusta breeding counts the country among the West African sites of origin of the species' Guinean group, one of the two wild families that studies of the plant distinguish.
  • Cuba: The same report sets a baseline for robusta, the trade name for Coffea canephora; a provincial official said in 2024 that robusta remains the main coffee in Santiago de Cuba.
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo: The species the national collection at Yangambi holds, and the one the International Coffee Organization's table marks first for the country. No document read gives its share of the crop.
  • Gabon: Coffea canephora was in cultivation in Gabon by 1910, when material from there was taken to Côte d'Ivoire. No document read describes what is grown today.
  • Ghana: The species World Coffee Research says Ghana grows. No share of the crop or growing region is given.
  • Guinea: Coffea canephora, mainly of the introduced Congolese group and its hybrids with the native Guinean group.
  • Laos: The dominant species on the FAO manual's figures for 2001, at 88 per cent of the coffee area, and grown unusually high, up to 1,300 metres. No document read gives a share for the present day.
  • Liberia: Collected from farmers' fields in 2025 by the seed project, which gives no share of the crop for any species.
  • Madagascar: The crop of the east coast and the north-west. The 2024 report gives robusta 95 per cent of the country's coffee-growing regions on a ministry figure of 2004, which is a share of regions and not of the crop.
  • Malaysia: Ten per cent on the same figures. The USDA's table labels all of Malaysia's production robusta, which agrees with no Malaysian source read.
  • Togo: Coffea canephora, grown as the local niaouli type. The study's cultivated samples from Togo all fall in one Central African genetic group.

Liberica

Atlas entries: Indonesia, Philippines, Sierra Leone.

  • Ghana: Native as a wild forest plant. The study does not say that Liberica is farmed in Ghana today.
  • Guyana: The president called Guyana the land of Liberica in a speech of April 2023, and the agriculture ministry named Liberica beside Arabica in a planting plan in 2025. Neither is a botanical identification, and no survey of what is planted was found.
  • Liberia: Native: Liberia is one of the five countries of the species' wild range. The seed project of 2025 also collected Liberica from farmers' fields.
  • Malaysia: Eighty-seven per cent of Malaysia's coffee on the minister's figures for 2024; the report does not say whether that is a share of the planted area or of the harvest.
  • Nigeria: Native as a wild forest plant, on a specimen collected at Omo in 1946. The study does not say that Liberica is farmed in Nigeria today.

Excelsa

Atlas entries: Philippines.

  • Central African Republic: Native as a wild plant. No document read says that excelsa is farmed in the Central African Republic today.
  • Guinea: A 2025 study names Guinea as one of three example countries where excelsa is farmed. It gives no place or quantity.

By variety

Where a document names a variety in a country: found there, selected there, released there, introduced there or grown there. Many of these statements are about the past. Each variety page gives the sentence and its source. This is a record of what has been read, not a map of where a variety is planted now.

Batian
Kenya
Bourbon
Brazil, China, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Kenya, Nepal, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Bolivia, Burundi
Castillo
Colombia
Catimor
China, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Indonesia, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Thailand, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Vietnam, Bolivia, Laos, Malawi, Zambia
Catuaí
Brazil, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Thailand, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Bolivia
Caturra
Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Thailand, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Bolivia, Zambia
F1 hybrids
Costa Rica, Nicaragua
Gesha (Geisha)
Ethiopia, Panama, Malawi
Java
Cameroon, Indonesia
Maragogipe
Brazil, Nicaragua
Mundo Novo
Brazil, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Bolivia
Pacamara
El Salvador, Nicaragua, Panama
Pacas
El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua
Robusta and conilon cultivars
Brazil, Indonesia, Thailand, Uganda, Vietnam, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea
Ruiru 11
Kenya
Sarchimor
Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico)
SL28
Kenya, Uganda, Malawi, Zambia
SL34
Kenya, Malawi, Zambia
Timor Hybrid
Jamaica, Timor-Leste
Typica
Brazil, China, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Indonesia, Jamaica, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Rwanda, Uganda, United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico), Bolivia, Burundi, Laos
Villa Sarchi
Costa Rica, Honduras

By processing

What happens to the fruit after picking, and what kind of statement puts each country here. A present-day description, a study's record of particular lots, a trading label and a statement from 1922 are four different strengths of evidence, so each country carries the one that applies.

Washed (wet) process

  • Brazil (described as present-day practice)
  • Cameroon (described as present-day practice)
  • China (described as present-day practice)
  • Colombia (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Costa Rica (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Dominican Republic (described as present-day practice)
  • Ecuador (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • El Salvador (described as present-day practice)
  • Ethiopia (described as present-day practice)
  • Guatemala (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Honduras (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • India (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Kenya (described as present-day practice)
  • Mexico (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Nepal (described as present-day practice)
  • Nicaragua (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Panama (lots recorded by a study in one place)
  • Papua New Guinea (described as present-day practice)
  • Peru (described as present-day practice)
  • Philippines (described as present-day practice)
  • Rwanda (described as present-day practice)
  • Sri Lanka (described as present-day practice)
  • Thailand (described as present-day practice)
  • United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico) (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Venezuela (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Vietnam (described as present-day practice)
  • Angola: The Calulo-Gabela zone produced largely wet-processed coffee in the early 1970s, on the 1977 report.
  • Bolivia: The thesis describes fruit pulped on the farm or at a growers' organisation's plant and dried to parchment, with pulp, mucilage and wash water as by-products. It does not use the word washed and gives no share.
  • Burundi: Burundi's documents separate fully washed coffee, which goes through a washing station, from coffee pulped by hand on the farm; the 2016 appraisal says about 50 to 60 per cent of the crop was fully washed, and a 2011 assessment that around 20 per cent was washed on farms.
  • Cuba: The lender's report lists the wet removal of pulp from the cherries among the project's environmental risks and proposes pilot wet mills run by cooperatives; it gives no share of the crop processed this way.
  • Laos: Part of the arabica was washed in 2005, on the FAO manual's account. No document read says how much of the crop is washed today.
  • Malawi: Smallholders deliver cherry to pulperies where it is floated, pulped, fermented dry, washed, soaked and dried to parchment before hulling at the union's mill in Mzuzu.
  • Zambia: The 1987 report recommends fully washed coffee as the aim, with small growers delivering parchment to the state company's factory.
  • Zimbabwe: The FAO paper of 2000 says Zimbabwe's arabica is processed by the wet method; nothing more recent was read.

Natural (dry) process

  • Brazil (described as present-day practice)
  • Cameroon (described as present-day practice)
  • Ecuador (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • El Salvador (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Ethiopia (described as present-day practice)
  • India (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Indonesia (lots recorded by a study in one place)
  • Mexico (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Nepal (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Panama (lots recorded by a study in one place)
  • Philippines (described as present-day practice)
  • Sierra Leone (described as present-day practice)
  • Sri Lanka (described as present-day practice)
  • Thailand (described as present-day practice)
  • Venezuela (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Vietnam (described as present-day practice)
  • Yemen (a historical statement, not a description of the present)
  • Angola: The Dembos-Uíge zone produced dry-processed robusta, sold as Ambriz, in the early 1970s; an FAO paper of 2000 describes Angola's crop as processed by the dry method.
  • Central African Republic: The government's 2008 fact sheet gives the preparation as the dry method, and grades the result by the number of defects in 300 grams.
  • Laos: In 2005, the FAO manual says, most robusta was dried whole in the sun as cherry and then roughly hulled, and part of the arabica was dried the same way. No figure for the present day was read.

Pulped natural

  • Brazil (described as present-day practice)

Honey process

  • Ecuador (how the coffee is classed in trade, not a description of practice)
  • Indonesia (lots recorded by a study in one place)
  • Panama (lots recorded by a study in one place)

Wet-hulled (giling basah)

  • Indonesia (described as present-day practice)

When coffee is picked, where a source says

CoffeeHQ explanatory model — not a measurement

Harvest months named by a source, for the atlas entries written from documents
Country and what the months apply toJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Brazil: Conilon (robusta)not namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot named
Brazil: Arabicanot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot named
Peru: Whole countrynot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot named
Colombia: Main harvestnot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Colombia: Mitaca, the second harvestnot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot named
Ethiopia: Main harvestnot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Indonesia: Robusta, southern Sumatra lowlandsnot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot named
Indonesia: Robusta, southern Sumatra highlandsnot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot named
Indonesia: Arabica, Acehnot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot named
Vietnam: Start of the season onlynot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenot namednot named
Mexico: Whole country, as described in 1922named by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Guatemala: Whole country, as described in 1922 (chapter on cultivation)named by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Guatemala: Whole country, as described in 1922 (chapter on preparation)not namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Costa Rica: Whole country, the months in which the harvest is concentratednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Costa Rica: From the lower south to the highest farmsnamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Tanzania: Northern and southern zonesnot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Tanzania: Western zonenot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot named
India: Arabicanamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a source
India: Robustanamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a source
El Salvador: Whole countrynamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Papua New Guinea: Arabica, main harvestnot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot named
Papua New Guinea: Arabica, main season, as a 2009 handbook gives itnot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot named
Papua New Guinea: Robusta around Milne Bay, as a 2009 handbook gives itnot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot named
Ecuador: Whole country, domestically grown beansnot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot named
Ecuador: Whole country, as described in 1922not namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot named
Venezuela: Whole country, as described in 1922named by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Dominican Republic: Whole country, as the coffee institute registered it in 2024 and 2025named by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
United States: Kona district, Hawaii Island, farms surveyed in 2016 and 2017not namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
United States: Kaʻū district, Hawaii Island, farms surveyed in 2016 and 2017named by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
United States: Puerto Rico, as described in 1922named by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Philippines: Areas planted with wildlings, with Kalinga in northern Luzon as the examplenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a source
Thailand: Arabica under the Kafae Doi Chaang specification, Chiang Rai provincenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Thailand: Arabica under the Kafae Doi Tung specification, Chiang Rai provincenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Sri Lanka: Ceylon's coffee plantations in the nineteenth centurynamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a source
Sierra Leone: Whole countrynamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenamed by a sourcenot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednot namednamed by a source
  • Brazil: Conilon (robusta): Began in April in the 2025/26 harvest, which was expected to finish by September (one named season).
  • Brazil: Arabica: Began in May in the 2025/26 harvest, which was expected to finish by September (one named season).
  • Peru: Whole country: April through September, with the peak in June and July (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Colombia: Main harvest: October to December (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Colombia: Mitaca, the second harvest: April to June, concentrated in the central coffee region (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Ethiopia: Main harvest: October to December (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Indonesia: Robusta, southern Sumatra lowlands: March to May (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Indonesia: Robusta, southern Sumatra highlands: June or July to August, as expected for 2026 (one named season).
  • Indonesia: Arabica, Aceh: October and November (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Vietnam: Start of the season only: The season opens on 1 October; the source read gives no end month (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Mexico: Whole country, as described in 1922: November to January, in a trade history of 1922; nothing more recent was read (a description from 1922).
  • Guatemala: Whole country, as described in 1922 (chapter on cultivation): August to January, in a trade history of 1922; the 2026 attaché report names no months (a description from 1922).
  • Guatemala: Whole country, as described in 1922 (chapter on preparation): October through December, in a different chapter of the same 1922 history; the two do not agree (a description from 1922).
  • Costa Rica: Whole country, the months in which the harvest is concentrated: Concentrated in November to February; the 2025 and 2026 reports say the same (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Costa Rica: From the lower south to the highest farms: Starts around August at lower altitudes in the south and can end around May in some higher areas (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Tanzania: Northern and southern zones: July to December, in the coffee board's calendar as the 2026 report prints it; the 2025 report said July to October for the country (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Tanzania: Western zone: May to October, in the coffee board's calendar as the 2026 report prints it (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • India: Arabica: Arabica harvest takes place from November to January (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • India: Robusta: The robusta harvest occurs from December to February (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • El Salvador: Whole country: Harvesting October to March, on the Coffee Council's 2016 profile; its monthly table puts 71 to 82 per cent of each year in November to January (the usual season, in a document that is not recent).
  • Papua New Guinea: Arabica, main harvest: Normally May to July, in a training manual of 2025, which adds that enough cherry usually ripens from March to October for more picking (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).
  • Papua New Guinea: Arabica, main season, as a 2009 handbook gives it: Generally May to September and particularly June, July and August, varying a little between years and places (the usual season, in a document that is not recent).
  • Papua New Guinea: Robusta around Milne Bay, as a 2009 handbook gives it: A main harvest from May to August; the same handbook reports no definite season on the Gazelle Peninsula (the usual season, in a document that is not recent).
  • Ecuador: Whole country, domestically grown beans: Between April and October, in the attaché's report of May 2022; it does not separate the species or the regions (the usual season, in a document that is not recent).
  • Ecuador: Whole country, as described in 1922: The trees blossom in December and are picked through April, May and June (a description from 1922).
  • Venezuela: Whole country, as described in 1922: Gathered from November through March; no present-day document read names harvest months (a description from 1922).
  • Dominican Republic: Whole country, as the coffee institute registered it in 2024 and 2025: More than nine tenths of each year's registered quintals fall in October to February; the 2025 report prints November and December two ways (one institution's register of when the harvest was recorded, not a statement in words).
  • United States: Kona district, Hawaii Island, farms surveyed in 2016 and 2017: August to December where the study describes the farms; it gives September to December elsewhere (stated for one named area or one study's farms, not for the country).
  • United States: Kaʻū district, Hawaii Island, farms surveyed in 2016 and 2017: September to February where the study describes the farms; it gives September to April elsewhere (stated for one named area or one study's farms, not for the country).
  • United States: Puerto Rico, as described in 1922: Harvesting from September into January in about ten pickings; no present-day document read gives Puerto Rico's months (a description from 1922).
  • Philippines: Areas planted with wildlings, with Kalinga in northern Luzon as the example: Usually December to March, on the national roadmap; no calendar by species or region was found (stated for one named area or one study's farms, not for the country).
  • Thailand: Arabica under the Kafae Doi Chaang specification, Chiang Rai province: The trees flower in February and the cherries are harvested between November and March (stated for one named area or one study's farms, not for the country).
  • Thailand: Arabica under the Kafae Doi Tung specification, Chiang Rai province: Yearly harvesting time is around October to February (stated for one named area or one study's farms, not for the country).
  • Sri Lanka: Ceylon's coffee plantations in the nineteenth century: October to February, given to explain why labour migration was seasonal; no present-day document read names harvest months (a historian's statement about the nineteenth century).
  • Sierra Leone: Whole country: Usually December to March, in the dry season, on a 2023 review from the national research institute (the usual season, as a recent report describes it).

Read across, the rows show why "the coffee harvest" has no single season: between them they name every month of the year. Each entry gives its statement in full and says what it rests on: Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Tanzania, India, El Salvador, Papua New Guinea, Ecuador, Venezuela, Dominican Republic, United States, Philippines, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone.

Nicaragua has no row. The attaché's report dates flowering and the mid-summer dry spell and gives no harvest months.

Kenya has no row. The attaché's report says when exports are usually lowest and highest and gives no harvest months.

China has no row. A 2025 yield study dates the fruit's maturity to November to February, which is when it ripens and not a statement of picking months.

Cameroon has no row. The coffee board gives the dates between which each species may be traded, not picked; the only picking months found are a thesis's citation of a page that was not opened.

Panama has no row. The only months found are a 1922 history's, which names no province; no modern source read gives a picking calendar for either species.

Jamaica has no row. The one record found is of two farms in one crop cycle, in a 2023 field study; no official picking calendar was found.

Timor-Leste has no row. A 2011 household survey in one municipality charted when coffee income arrived, not when coffee was picked; no national calendar was found.

Nepal has no row. The coffee board's pages give no months, and the papers read are about climate, a pest and DNA.

Not in this table: Honduras, Uganda, Rwanda, Yemen. Where one of those entries states when coffee is picked, it does so in its own text.

Basis: The harvest months named in the sources behind each atlas entry written from documents: mostly USDA attaché reports of 2025 and 2026, with national profiles, manuals and roadmaps, two protected-name specifications, one institution's register and a trade history of 1922. Each row says which kind it is Limits: Statements from different documents and years set side by side, not a survey. A marked month means a source names it; an unmarked one means only that no source read does. Several rows describe one season or one area, some rest on a document that is no longer recent, and those from 1922 are a century old. The table covers 21 of the atlas's entries; the others are listed beneath it, each with the reason it has no row or a note that it has not been brought into the table.

Explore the atlas by subject

Each entry written from documents has sections no other country's page has. Here they are sorted by what they are about. A country is listed under a subject only where its entry has something of its own to say on it.

Species, varieties and breeding

What is planted, who bred it, and what disease has done to the choice.

Land, landscape and who farms it

Where the coffee is, what it replaced, and the size of the farms.

Harvest and labour

How the crop is picked, by whom, and what picking costs.

Processing

What happens to the fruit after picking, and why it is done that way there.

Trade, institutions and policy

Who buys the coffee, who governs the sector, and what a name on a bag legally means.

History

How each country came to grow coffee, including what is legend and what is record.

The cup

What is and is not known about how an origin's coffee tastes.

By how coffee is drunk where it is grown

A producing country is not only an origin for somebody else's cup. These are the preparation and coffeehouse traditions CoffeeHQ has documented in countries that grow coffee. A country without one here has not been researched for it; that is a gap in the atlas, not a statement about the country.

Brazil
Brazilian cafezinho
Colombia
Colombian tinto
Costa Rica
Costa Rican chorreador
Cuba
Cuban cafecito and espumita
Dominican Republic
Caribbean café colao
Ethiopia
Ethiopian coffee ceremony (jebena buna), Somali bun (fried coffee beans)
India
South Indian filter coffee, Kerala kattan kaapi, The Indian Coffee House
Indonesia
Kopi tubruk, Kopi joss
Kenya
Swahili kahawa chungu, Somali bun (fried coffee beans)
Malaysia
Nanyang kopi (Malaysian and Singaporean kopitiam coffee)
Mexico
Mexican café de olla
Peru
Peruvian café pasado
Philippines
Philippine kapeng barako
Tanzania
Tanzanian street kahawa
Thailand
Thai oliang
Vietnam
Vietnamese phin coffee, Vietnamese egg coffee (cà phê trứng), Vietnamese salt coffee (cà phê muối)
Yemen
Yemeni qishr

Two routes to follow

An atlas is easier to read along a line of argument than country by country. Each route is a sequence: the order is the point.

Follow one disease through the family tree

You have seen Catimor, Sarchimor or a hybrid's name on a bag and want to know why so many modern varieties are related.

One fungus explains much of what is planted today. This route starts with the disease, goes back to a chance cross found on Timor, forward through the varieties bred from it, and ends on the farms that had to choose.

  1. Coffee pests and diseasesWhat leaf rust is and what it does to a tree, before any variety is named.
  2. Coffea canephoraThe species the resistance came from.
  3. Timor HybridA natural cross of the two species, and the breeding parent behind the rest of this route.
  4. CatimorThe Timor Hybrid crossed with Caturra: the group, its members and their ratings side by side.
  5. SarchimorThe same idea with Villa Sarchi as the compact parent, and the lines selected from it.
  6. Catimor or SarchimorWhat the catalogue's ratings can and cannot tell you about two groups.
  7. First-generation hybridsThe next step: a resistant line crossed with an Ethiopian landrace, and why the plants cost more.
  8. ColombiaA country that bred its own resistant varieties over fifty years and replanted with them.
  9. GuatemalaWhat an attaché reports after an epidemic: about a third of the arabica replanted.
  10. KenyaA different disease and a related answer: Timor Hybrid lines in the parentage of Ruiru 11 and Batian.
  11. Managing a coffee farmWhere the choice lands: what a grower decides about the trees already in the ground.

Read an origin as evidence, not as a flavour

You want to know what a country or region name on a bag can actually tell you.

A place name carries several different kinds of fact, and they are not equally solid. This route takes them in order of how well they can be checked.

  1. BrazilStart with figures: what an estimate is, why it is revised, and why two official bodies disagree.
  2. Espírito SantoA region that is a state, a species and a breeding programme, each with a document behind it.
  3. Growing regionsWhat each regional name is: an administrative unit, a registered indication, a brand or a custom.
  4. Origin and traceability termsThe words that sit beside a place name, and which of them are defined anywhere.
  5. IndonesiaThe one trial read for the atlas that tried to find out whether a process, not a place, makes a taste.
  6. EthiopiaWhat the names on a bag are names of, and a processing choice that follows the price of cherries.
  7. Coffee Expert: world coffeeThe same ground as a lesson, with exercises in reading production data and regional claims.
  8. Tasting LabThe last kind of evidence is your own: two coffees side by side, with the labels hidden.

Compare the entries

Every atlas entry on the same five questions. Production is the USDA's estimate for 2025/26; marketing years differ between countries. The other columns show only what a document read for that entry states, so an empty cell means the sources are silent, not that the answer is none. There is no column for taste or quality, because no figure for either would mean anything at the scale of a country.

The atlas entries compared on production, species, documented processing, harvest months and documented varieties
CountryProductionSpeciesProcessing documentedHarvest months a source namesVarieties documented
Brazil63 million bagsArabica, RobustaNatural (dry) process; Pulped natural; Washed (wet) processApr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep (across 2 statements)Mundo Novo, Catuaí, Robusta and conilon cultivars, Caturra, Bourbon, Typica, Maragogipe, Sarchimor
CameroonNot itemised by the USDAArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process; Natural (dry) processNone namedJava
China1.9 million bagsArabicaWashed (wet) processNone namedCatimor, Typica, Bourbon
Colombia12.5 million bagsArabicaWashed (wet) process (1922 account)Apr, May, Jun, Oct, Nov, Dec (across 2 statements)Castillo, Caturra
Costa Rica1.16 million bagsArabicaWashed (wet) process (as traded)Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec (across 2 statements)Villa Sarchi, Catuaí, Caturra, Catimor, Sarchimor, F1 hybrids, Typica
Dominican RepublicNot itemised by the USDAArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) processJan, Feb, Oct, Nov, DecTypica, Caturra, Catimor
Ecuador350,000 bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (as traded); Natural (dry) process (as traded); Honey process (as traded)Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct (across 2 statements)Sarchimor, Caturra
El Salvador586,000 bagsArabicaWashed (wet) process; Natural (dry) process (1922 account)Jan, Feb, Mar, Oct, Nov, DecPacas, Pacamara, Bourbon, Sarchimor
Ethiopia11.6 million bagsArabicaNatural (dry) process; Washed (wet) processOct, Nov, DecGesha (Geisha)
Guatemala3.15 million bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (as traded)Jan, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec (across 2 statements)Catimor, Caturra, Catuaí, Sarchimor, Bourbon, Typica
Honduras5.53 million bagsArabicaWashed (wet) process (as traded)None namedBourbon, Catuaí, Caturra, Typica, Sarchimor, Villa Sarchi, Pacas, Catimor
India6.43 million bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (as traded); Natural (dry) process (as traded)Jan, Feb, Nov, Dec (across 2 statements)Bourbon
Indonesia12.4 million bagsArabica, Robusta, LibericaWet-hulled (giling basah); Honey process (lots recorded); Natural (dry) process (lots recorded)Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Oct, Nov (across 3 statements)Catimor, Robusta and conilon cultivars, Typica, Java
JamaicaNot itemised by the USDAArabicaNone documentedNone namedTypica, Catimor, Caturra, Timor Hybrid
Kenya850,000 bagsArabicaWashed (wet) processNone namedSL28, SL34, Ruiru 11, Batian, Bourbon
Mexico4.08 million bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (1922 account); Natural (dry) process (1922 account)Jan, Nov, DecCatimor
NepalNot itemised by the USDAArabicaWashed (wet) process; Natural (dry) process (as traded)None namedTypica, Bourbon
Nicaragua2.56 million bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (1922 account)None namedCaturra, Bourbon, Pacas, Catuaí, Catimor, Maragogipe, Pacamara, Sarchimor, F1 hybrids
PanamaNot itemised by the USDAArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (lots recorded); Natural (dry) process (lots recorded); Honey process (lots recorded)None namedGesha (Geisha), Caturra, Catuaí, Pacamara
Papua New Guinea800,000 bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) processMay, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep (across 3 statements)Typica, Bourbon, Mundo Novo, Caturra, Catimor
Peru4.76 million bagsArabicaWashed (wet) processApr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, SepTypica, Caturra, Bourbon, Mundo Novo
Philippines450,000 bagsArabica, Robusta, Liberica, ExcelsaNatural (dry) process; Washed (wet) processJan, Feb, Mar, DecNone documented
RwandaNot itemised by the USDAArabicaWashed (wet) processNone namedBourbon, Typica
Sierra LeoneNot itemised by the USDAArabica, Robusta, LibericaNatural (dry) processJan, Feb, Mar, DecNone documented
Sri LankaNot itemised by the USDAArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process; Natural (dry) processJan, Feb, Oct, Nov, DecNone documented
Tanzania1.45 million bagsArabica, RobustaNone documentedMay, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec (across 2 statements)Bourbon
Thailand900,000 bagsArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process; Natural (dry) processJan, Feb, Mar, Oct, Nov, Dec (across 2 statements)Catimor, Caturra, Catuaí, Robusta and conilon cultivars
Timor-LesteNot itemised by the USDAArabicaNone documentedNone namedTimor Hybrid
Uganda7.09 million bagsArabica, RobustaNone documentedNone namedSL28, Robusta and conilon cultivars, Typica, Bourbon
United States (Hawaii and Puerto Rico)Not itemised by the USDAArabica, RobustaWashed (wet) process (1922 account)Jan, Feb, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec (across 3 statements)Typica, Caturra, Catuaí, Bourbon, Sarchimor, Catimor
Venezuela500,000 bagsArabicaNatural (dry) process (1922 account); Washed (wet) process (as traded)Jan, Feb, Mar, Nov, DecNone documented
Vietnam31.7 million bagsArabica, RobustaNatural (dry) process; Washed (wet) processOctCatimor, Robusta and conilon cultivars
YemenNot itemised by the USDAArabicaNatural (dry) process (1922 account)None namedNone documented

Harvest months are every month any source names for any part of the country, set together; the table further down this page keeps each statement separate and says what it applies to. Farm structure is not a column: the entries describe it in words, from sources that count farms in ways that cannot be lined up.

How complete this atlas is

The atlas has a full entry for 33 of the 55 countries for which CoffeeHQ has documentary evidence of coffee production or export: a country named in the USDA's list of producing countries, in the International Coffee Organization's membership list of March 2026, or reporting an official figure to the United Nations' food agency for 2024. A further 22 have a sourced account, and the coverage page holds those accounts, how the list of producers was drawn up, and why each country has an account and not an entry.