Skip to content
CoffeeHQ

Espírito Santo

Brazil's second coffee state and the home of conilon, the country's robusta: Espírito Santo grows about seven tenths of Brazil's conilon and, on the USDA's reckoning, a fifth of the world's robusta, as well as being Brazil's third-largest arabica producer. This page covers how one small state came to grow both species, what its research institute did to conilon, and what its two geographical indications require.

What this name is
An administrative unit
A Brazilian state. Two registered indications carry its name: one for conilon covering the whole state, and one for the arabica of its mountains.
The five kinds of regional name

Espírito Santo's harvest by species

Measured data

Conilon (robusta)

Espírito Santo conilon production by marketing year
Marketing yearConilon production
2021/2215.7 million bags
2022/2316.6 million bags
2023/2415.0 million bags
2024/2515.0 million bags

Arabica

Espírito Santo arabica production by marketing year
Marketing yearArabica production
2021/223.7 million bags
2022/234.4 million bags
2023/243.0 million bags
2024/254.0 million bags

Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Brazil: Coffee Annual (BR2025-0013), Table 2. Period: Marketing years 2021/22 to 2024/25 (July to June), as estimated in May 2025. The attaché's own estimates, in million 60 kg bags to one decimal place as published. Both charts are drawn to the same scale.

One state, two coffees

Espírito Santo grows two crops that have little to do with each other. Conilon, which is Coffea canephora, is concentrated in the north of the state. Arabica grows towards the south, almost all of it without irrigation. The figures on this page show the proportion: in recent seasons roughly four bags of conilon for every bag of arabica.

Either crop alone would make the state a significant producer. Set beside the USDA's table of producing countries for the same year, its arabica harvest is larger than those of Guatemala or Nicaragua, and its conilon harvest is larger than the robusta crop of any country except Vietnam. That comparison is CoffeeHQ's own arithmetic on two published tables, and the tables were compiled a year apart.

How conilon came to the state, and why it stayed marginal for fifty years

The state research institute's own history dates the arrival of Coffea canephora to around 1912, when the first seeds were planted in the municipality of Cachoeiro de Itapemirim and later taken to the north of the state. For half a century it was a minor crop. Commercial planting became significant only from the 1960s, and at first the aim was modest: to put coffee on land considered marginal for arabica.

The plants descended from selections of the Kouillou group of the species, and they were grown from seed. A seed-grown field of this species is a mixture: plants that differ from one another in yield, in when they ripen and in other characteristics. The institute's account of those years is blunt about the result, describing poor management, low production potential and inferior cup quality.

What the breeding programme changed

In 1985 the state institute, then called Emcapa and now Incaper, began a breeding programme for the species. Its main method was to select outstanding plants and multiply them as clones, so that a cultivar is a group of selected clones planted together. Fields grown this way are more uniform than seed-grown ones, including in when the fruit ripens.

The first three clonal cultivars were released in 1993, distinguished by whether they ripen early, in mid-season or late. The institute counts ten cultivars from the programme's first thirty years, most of them clonal and at least one propagated by seed. Combined with irrigation, this is the main reason conilon went from a marginal crop to a high-yielding one. About seven tenths of the state's conilon is irrigated, according to the institute's figures as reported by the USDA.

What the state's two indications require

Espírito Santo has two registered geographical indications for coffee, both dating from 2021, one for each species. The indication of provenance named simply 'Espírito Santo' is for conilon and covers the whole state. It applies to green, roasted and soluble coffee, and the registration sets a minimum of 78 points on the fine-robusta cupping protocol developed by the Coffee Quality Institute and Uganda's coffee authority. A robusta defined by a minimum cupping score is a recent idea, and this is one of the places it has been written into a register.

The second, Montanhas do Espírito Santo, is a denomination of origin for the state's mountain arabica. CoffeeHQ has seen it listed with its type and year but has not read its specification, so it does not describe its rules here.

Why the state's harvest moves differently from the rest of Brazil's

The two-year swing that dominates Brazil's national figures is an arabica phenomenon, and much of this state's conilon is irrigated. In the seasons when drought and heat cut the arabica harvest in Minas Gerais and São Paulo, the USDA's attaché reported conilon in Espírito Santo and Bahia thriving, and Brazil's robusta crop reached a record in 2025/26 while its arabica crop fell. The state is also where the pressure on labour is reported most plainly: growers are investing in mechanisation because of labour shortages.

This region is one part of a larger picture. The Brazil entry in the world coffee atlas covers the country's harvest cycle, processing, grading and history.

How this page was put together

The figures are published estimates, shown with their source and period. The rest is CoffeeHQ's own account of the documents listed below, not first-hand reporting. Last reviewed 2026-10-08.

What we have deliberately not stated

  • Altitudes for either growing area. No document read for this page gives them.
  • How the state's coffee is processed. The sources read do not describe it.
  • The rules of the Montanhas do Espírito Santo denomination, whose specification was not read.
  • Yield figures for individual cultivars, which are the breeding institute's own trial results.

Sources